Rowlatt Act of 1919

The Rowlatt Act, officially known as the Anarchical and Revolutionary Crimes Act of 1919, was one of the most controversial laws enacted during British colonial rule in India. Passed by the Imperial Legislative Council, it marked a grim chapter in India's legal history, igniting widespread outrage and catalyzing the Indian independence movement. This legislation not only curtailed civil liberties but also exposed the colonial government's deep mistrust of Indian political aspirations.

Background and Origins

  • Post-World War I Anxiety: After World War I, the British government feared a resurgence of revolutionary activities in India. The wartime Defence of India Act (1915) had granted sweeping powers to suppress dissent, but it was set to expire.
  • Rowlatt Committee: In 1917, the British appointed a committee led by Justice Sir Sidney Rowlatt to investigate "revolutionary conspiracies". The committee’s report recommended extending wartime powers into peacetime.

Key Provisions of the Rowlatt Act

The Act was passed on March 18, 1919, despite unanimous opposition from Indian members of the council. Its provisions included:

  • Preventive Detention: Authorities could arrest and detain individuals suspected of revolutionary activities without trial for up to two years.
  • No Right to Appeal: Trials were conducted by special tribunals without juries, and there was no provision for appeal.
  • Suspension of Habeas Corpus: The fundamental legal safeguard against unlawful detention was suspended.
  • Press Censorship: The Act imposed stricter controls on the press, curbing freedom of expression.
  • Surveillance and Restrictions: Convicted individuals were barred from participating in political, educational, or religious activities.

Indian Response and Resistance

The Act was immediately condemned across India:

  • Political Opposition: Leaders like Mahatma Gandhi, Muhammad Ali Jinnah, and Madan Mohan Malaviya vocally opposed the Act. Jinnah even resigned from the council in protest.
  • Satyagraha Movement: Gandhi launched a nationwide Satyagraha (nonviolent resistance) campaign, urging Indians to peacefully oppose the law.
  • Mass Protests: Demonstrations erupted in major cities, with strikes, marches, and public meetings becoming common.

The Jallianwala Bagh Massacre: A Brutal Aftermath

The most tragic consequence of the Rowlatt Act was the Jallianwala Bagh massacre on April 13, 1919:

  • In Amritsar, thousands gathered peacefully to protest the Act.
  • British Brigadier General Reginald Dyer ordered troops to fire on the unarmed crowd, killing hundreds and injuring over a thousand.
  • The massacre shocked the nation and the world, galvanizing support for the independence movement and eroding British moral authority.

Impact on the Independence Movement

  • Radicalization of Nationalism: The betrayal felt by Indians led to a shift from moderate petitions to assertive demands for Swaraj (self-rule).
  • Gandhi’s Emergence: The Rowlatt Satyagraha marked Gandhi’s rise as a national leader and strategist of mass civil disobedience.
  • Repeal and Legacy: The Act was eventually repealed in 1922, but its legacy endured as a symbol of colonial oppression.

Conclusion

The Rowlatt Act was more than just a law - it was a catalyst. It exposed the colonial government's unwillingness to trust its subjects and its readiness to suppress dissent at any cost. The Indian response, marked by unity and resilience, laid the groundwork for future movements that would eventually lead to independence in 1947.